http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math Mathematical discussions and pursuits. 2010-03-10T00:33:51Z Google Groups Ask me about System Design grpad...@gmail.com 2010-03-10T00:33:51Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/7d7d33fdde987d68/753316e348b30f02?show_docid=753316e348b30f02

Article? No. <br> Book? Try Rubin and Rubin's Equivalents of The Axiom of <br> Choice, or a similarly titled tome. <br> Gerhard &quot;Ask Me About System Design&quot; Paseman, 2010.03.09

Mike mat...@hofstra.edu 2010-03-10T00:16:39Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/7d7d33fdde987d68/1dce1862cf8a574d?show_docid=1dce1862cf8a574d

Hi all, <br> Wikipedia's article on axiom of choice states that Tarski proved <br> that the statement if X is infinite then X is bijectively equivalent <br> to XxX is equivalent to axiom of choice. I know how to prove that AC <br> implies X=XxX for infinite X. I am curious to know the proof in the <br> other direction. Does anyone know a reference for this? It seems

Andrew Usher k_over_hb...@yahoo.com 2010-03-10T00:08:50Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2f48e6574de6e516/d31905110841be13?show_docid=d31905110841be13

I often have difficulty explaining my logic to other people. I'm not <br> sure if that is because they're dumb or prejudiced or because I'm not <br> explaining it well. In this particular case, you're putting up a straw <br> man. <br> The connection between 'the metric system' and 'white guilt' can not <br> be made in a single step, and you're asking as though it should.

Andrew Usher k_over_hb...@yahoo.com 2010-03-10T00:01:59Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2f48e6574de6e516/c326408c95e8cf50?show_docid=c326408c95e8cf50

This can not be considered a reliable test. <br> Probably your true IQ is somewhat lower that that. By the way, cranks <br> (like you) normally do have higher-than-average intelligence. <br> Andrew Usher

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard j.deboynepollard-newsgro...@ntlworld.com 2010-03-07T19:00:37Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/dc87b16891900b18/f08393169ba1ff82?show_docid=f08393169ba1ff82

... because, as we all know, infinity divided by a finite number is ... <br> erm ... finite and ... erm ... smaller. <br> Robert Wilensky is proven right by this very thread.

PD thedraperfam...@gmail.com 2010-03-09T23:27:01Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/fbd8c94784384582?show_docid=fbd8c94784384582

But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after <br> all.

Inertial relativ...@rest.com 2010-03-09T22:15:32Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/b7e44bb3a56d0982/88ac49881edae303?show_docid=88ac49881edae303

But you are soooooo amusing. <br> Clearly you do not take yourself seriously .. noone saying the nonsense you <br> do does. <br> We're all laughing at you. One of the biggest clowns on the newsgroups (up <br> there with the insane George Hammond).

PD thedraperfam...@gmail.com 2010-03-09T23:26:04Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/b0f60572a4bdca2d?show_docid=b0f60572a4bdca2d

Irony meter just went into the red.

PD thedraperfam...@gmail.com 2010-03-09T23:25:18Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/c9dffcac23be12b1?show_docid=c9dffcac23be12b1

Yes, I know. You're incompetent with a newsgroup reader, and so if <br> people don't carry water to your lips, you will ignore them.

PD thedraperfam...@gmail.com 2010-03-09T23:23:55Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/cbef1e0913837683?show_docid=cbef1e0913837683

Really? The plane is traveling at 550 mph through the aether, so your <br> hair is traveling at 550 mph relative to the aether. The ventilation <br> system pumps air at 2 mph relative to the aether. And the hair doesn't <br> move? <br> Are you sure? I think you'll be surprised if you actually do this.

RussellE reaste...@gmail.com 2010-03-09T23:08:21Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d0b953a11c077a61/72d1c36733f7e1fe?show_docid=72d1c36733f7e1fe

Thanks! <br> I would consider a theory where the only models are less <br> than a certain finite cardinality to be an ultrafinite theory. <br> Could you point me to references about such theories? <br> Russell <br> - Mathematics is the only true religion

NoEinstein noeinst...@bellsouth.net 2010-03-09T22:54:58Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/b9cdc408ffea7289?show_docid=b9cdc408ffea7289

Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is <br> proportional to the frontal area of the hair. *** Pressure from *** <br> ether flow is independent of the frontal area and is in proportion to <br> the average density of the hair. The ventilation system inside planes <br> causes more hair motion than the flowing ether. Budding scientists

Psychotic Embolism b...@hotmail.com 2010-03-09T22:49:12Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d8c13488e73e6b1f/3103efa9e69aa944?show_docid=3103efa9e69aa944

Apostrophe's and they're use's, you fucking imbecile.

mpc755 mpc...@gmail.com 2010-03-09T22:48:29Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/eb82c36910f97f23?show_docid=eb82c36910f97f23

Does the aether vanish when the matter which is Jupiter occupies the <br> space previously occupied by the aether? Of course not. The aether <br> does not vanish. The aether does not disappear. The aether which <br> existed in the three dimensional space prior to the matter which is <br> Jupiter occupying this same space is displaced. The aether is

mpc755 mpc...@gmail.com 2010-03-09T22:44:46Z http://groups.google.co.bw/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/dab6904aee2e44c9?show_docid=dab6904aee2e44c9

Your post is responding to my post. If you don't want me to respond to <br> your posts then don't respond to mine. <br> The title of this thread is stating gravity is &quot;the PUSH of flowing <br> aether&quot;. <br> A better description of gravity is the pressure associated with the <br> aether displaced by massive objects.